freeze the funds and shares owned or controlled directly or indirectly from the clan Gaddafi. Through relevant public and private information 
Italian was given news of a distinction made by the Ministry of Economy and Foreign Affairs of the Italian Government between the Libyan state-owned assets and property owned by the Gaddafi family and his clan. Also according to these sources would have been or should have raised an issue before international bodies to Europeans about the practical relevance of this distinction. However, a simple reading of the text of Resolution 1970 of UN Security Council without the possibility of uncertainty belies the Italian interpretation doubtful. It is very clear that Resolution 1970 does not distinguish between owners and those who directly or indirectly controlling funds, stocks and financial resources if the ownership or control may be due to one or more of the 26 people listed exactly and appointed on the same resolution 1970, ie c 
lan Gaddafi.
There being no logical basis for the doubts raised by the Italian authorities, the delay that is achieved in implementing the decision of the Security Council by the Authorities of the Italian State has the effect of violating the resolution instead expressly ago obligations on Member States to proceed without delay to the freezing of Libyan assets and other measures. No majority party or the opposition has so far raised the question of the violation of a UN resolution by the Italian and the consequent violation of the Italian Constitution, which restricts it should be noted national sovereignty in matters of international security in favor of International Organizations (UN) to which Italy is a member.
There were no reports of protests by other States for the still non-imposition of sanctions by the Italian authorities.
A link in the network of international sanctions would take away from the clan of Gaddafi their countrymen Libyan economic resources would allow the Colonel and his men to quietly settle funds and securities in Italy, to shield the legitimate availability of the nation's Libyan , improperly and unlawfully altering balances, already precarious, market Italian and international financial. In addition, the freezing of Libyan funds is for those who implement a serious economic guarantee for the respect of both Resolution 1970, and for any damage that d 
ovessero arise in the future by the Libyan crisis.
The threat of retaliation expressly stated in the last hours by the Colonel consisting of the "invasion" of Europe via Italy by the African migrants deliberately uncontrolled by the Libyan authorities would, if carried out, a violation of the Treaty Italo Libyan-2010, and is in place, if only threatened, a denunciation of the Treaty.
Having the two Ministers of Foreign Affairs and Defense Italians insisted so much on the fact that the Italo-Libyan Treaty was "in fact" suspended for lack of an effective partner in this Talibanism supported by the more radical proposals of the opposition parties that supported the need A suspension not only in fact but most formal of the Treaty, we now confront the fact of to replicate so little to the threats of Colonel: if the treaty is suspended (in fact or law does not matter) each party is free to do as he wishes. Thanks.
