the square, morale, isms The public debate around the exhibition "If not now, when?" took essentially two directions, on opposite sides.
On the one hand there are the promoters of the square, the many women who have decided to demonstrate, demanding the resignation, explicit, of the Premier. At stake is the very idea of \u200b\u200bsociety, the collective narrative, the narrative of Italy posters and meaning will be another idea of \u200b\u200bthe country. Perhaps indignant, even moral, according to critics, even bigoted. But different from today. The question of "if not now when?" could ideally be extended to the past, the Berlusconi era in all its variations, would change little. What's different now?
The other direction of the debate is represented by anti-anti-Berlusconi together with Berlusconi. because, in a nutshell, the defense of the idea of \u200b\u200bsociety through the personalization the clash, through the habits of the premier. The key idea is that of freedom to which no limits can be placed if not of public importance. Unexceptionable, but again there is a question unanswered: how the story Ruby is private?
while in the debate, here's a little reflection on the keyword of the event:
indignation.